:Nobody is debating the appropriateness of broad vs . narrow transcription.
2.
This implies a narrow transcription, yet most of these representations are broad.
3.
A narrow transcription may, however, be used to distinguish them :,,.
4.
The disadvantage is that a narrow transcription is rarely representative of all speakers of a language.
5.
A close transcription, indicating precise details of the sounds, is called a " narrow transcription ".
6.
Neither nor are a completely narrow transcription of the stop component, which can be narrowly transcribed as ( advanced ).
7.
In the majority of languages described as having an ( which denotes a central and therefore a more narrow transcription of it is.
8.
A further disadvantage in less technical contexts is that narrow transcription involves a larger number of symbols that may be unfamiliar to non-specialists.
9.
The advantage of the narrow transcription is that it can help learners to get exactly the right sound, and allows linguists to make detailed analyses of language variation.
10.
A rule of thumb in many linguistics contexts is therefore to use a narrow transcription when it is necessary for the point being made, but a broad transcription whenever possible.
मोबाइल